SC-4244B

WE SHOULD CONSIDER THIS

At first - gov'ts denied they were seeding the skies despite the visual evidence across the world. And now they admit to it. Should we know something of the harmful chemicals in use? Then there're the lies!

TCW

ENVIRONMENT

PX-4244A

A PILOT'S EYE VIEW OF THE SKY

Chemtrail fallout has been tested - and found to include - Barium, Strontium, [carcinogenic] Aluminium Oxide [promotes Alzheimer's] micro plastics, Uranium and Graphene Oxide. All great for our health?

RICHARD VOBES

ENVIRONMENT

BP-5134D

CHEMTRAILS CAN'T BE GOOD

First, they denied it. Then they admitted it - saying it's for our protection. But they won't debate it. What does all this tell us about it? Now RFK is on their tail to end it. What is the real purpose - do you think?

THE PEOPLE'S VOICE

ENVIRONMENT

BP-5081B

CHEMTRAILS ARE A DANGER

Chemtrails were first denied - but now admitted. The puzzle is that there's been no open outright debate on the reasons for them or the possible health effects due to them. Gov't has been silent. Why is that?

THE PEOPLE'S VOICE

ENVIRONMENT

BP-5072D

PILOTS ADMIT DOING THIS

Are people wrong in thinking - if the gov't wishes to have people ingest chemicals or vaccines, they should be asked first? Explaining the reasons might be good too. Should there be a public debate even?

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC

ENVIRONMENT