BP-5134D

CHEMTRAILS CAN'T BE GOOD

First, they denied it. Then they admitted it - saying it's for our protection. But they won't debate it. What does all this tell us about it? Now RFK is on their tail to end it. What is the real purpose - do you think?

THE PEOPLE'S VOICE

ENVIRONMENT

BP-5081B

CHEMTRAILS ARE A DANGER

Chemtrails were first denied - but now admitted. The puzzle is that there's been no open outright debate on the reasons for them or the possible health effects due to them. Gov't has been silent. Why is that?

THE PEOPLE'S VOICE

ENVIRONMENT

BP-5072D

PILOTS ADMIT DOING THIS

Are people wrong in thinking - if the gov't wishes to have people ingest chemicals or vaccines, they should be asked first? Explaining the reasons might be good too. Should there be a public debate even?

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC

ENVIRONMENT

BP-4352B

RFK AND THE CHEMTRAILS

Whichever way many people look at this man, he appears to have the stamp of integrity. If these two giants get to the House - then next year could be truly explosive - and it's looking like - in a better way!

THE PEOPLE'S VOICE

ENVIRONMENT

BP-4275A

OUR SKIES ARE POISONED

First, gov'ts wouldn't admit to spraying our skies - and us - with chemicals. Now they tell us it's to save the planet. But gov'ts didn't tell us beforehand - didn't show us the science - and still won't allow debate.

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC

ENVIRONMENT